A Systematic Review of Digital Interventions for Promoting Mental Health in Higher Education Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64149/J.Carcinog.24.9s.333-345Keywords:
digital health, mental health, university students, systematic review, psychological wellbeingAbstract
Background: Mental health challenges among university students have reached concerning levels globally, with studies indicating that 30-60% of students experience clinically significant symptoms of anxiety, depression, or other mental health conditions. Digital health interventions represent a promising approach to address this crisis, offering scalable, accessible, and cost-effective solutions for mental health promotion and early intervention.
Objective: This systematic review aims to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of digital health interventions for mental health promotion among university students, examining intervention types, theoretical frameworks, implementation strategies, and outcomes.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and IEEE Xplore databases from January 2018 to December 2024. Studies were included if they evaluated digital health interventions targeting mental health promotion, prevention, or early intervention in university student populations. We extracted data on study characteristics, intervention features, theoretical foundations, and mental health outcomes. Risk of bias was assessed using appropriate tools for different study designs.
Results: Forty-seven studies met inclusion criteria, encompassing 23,847 participants across 15 countries. Interventions included mobile applications (n=18), web-based platforms (n=15), virtual reality applications (n=6), artificial intelligence chatbots (n=5), and wearable device integrations (n=3). Cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT), mindfulness-based interventions, and peer support models were the most common theoretical approaches. Significant improvements were observed in anxiety reduction (Cohen's d = 0.42-0.78), depression symptoms (d = 0.35-0.65), stress management (d = 0.38-0.72), and overall psychological wellbeing (d = 0.28-0.58). Implementation challenges included low engagement rates, technological barriers, and sustainability concerns.
Conclusions: Digital health interventions demonstrate moderate to strong effectiveness for mental health promotion in university students. However, significant heterogeneity in intervention design, implementation strategies, and outcome measures limits definitive conclusions. Future research should focus on standardized outcome measures, long-term follow-up, and implementation science approaches to enhance real-world impact.




