Clinical Longevity of Direct vs. Indirect Composite Restorations

Abstract

Offering aesthetic, conservative, and functional benefits, composite resin restorations are a popular treatment modality in contemporary dentistry. One of the critical decisions in restorative care is choosing between direct and indirect techniques. This paper evaluates the clinical longevity of these restorations by exploring material properties, technique sensitivity, patient-centered outcomes, failure modes, and cost-effectiveness. Moreover, it examines advances in composite materials and their impact on the durability and success of restoration. On the other hand, Restoration choices should be based on a patient-specific approach, taking into account factors such as oral hygiene, occlusal dynamics, dysfunctional habits, and lesion size. Evidence-based comparisons between direct and indirect composites enable informed decisions and optimal clinical outcomes.