Surgical Interventions Upon Diagnosis among Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Prostate Cancer cases: A Retrospective Study with Systematic Review

Abstract

Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer (PCa) stand as two of the most prevalent conditions affecting the prostate, each demanding distinct diagnostic and surgical strategies. This systematic review aims to take an overview of the surgical interventions used by surgeons and attempted on patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer. Many surgical interventions can be used with various degrees of appropriateness and effectiveness in terms of long-term survival for male patients. This systematic eview used search engine tools of Web of Science, Google scholar, and other search engines. From total 451 studies were collected from different search engines, and by using Rayan software to remove duplicates, only 10 studies were eligible and chosen for further assessment in both quality and bias. The most affective results are unipolar transurethral resection (TURP), Bipolar TURP, and open prostatectomy. The TUIP is not preferred for cases between 60 and 69 years old. The unipolar transurethral resection (TURP), Bipolar TURP, and open prostatectomy. Regarding the reimbursements paid mean per procedure was 1.43 times higher than for traditional procedures. Clearer diagnostic tools and more personalized approaches are needed to balance symptom relief with cancer control while maintaining patients’ quality of life