A Study Comparing Diagnostic Approaches in Oral Surgery and Oral Medicine for Soft Tissue Disorders

Abstract

Background: Soft tissue disorders in the oral cavity are common conditions that require accurate diagnosis and effective management. Oral surgeons and oral medicine specialists employ different diagnostic approaches based on their respective areas of expertise. Oral surgeons often focus on surgical interventions, while oral medicine specialists emphasize medical management. This study aims to compare the diagnostic approaches used by oral surgeons and oral medicine specialists for soft tissue disorders and assess their diagnostic accuracy, time to diagnosis, and treatment outcomes.

Methods: A comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 60 participants (30 oral surgery patients and 30 oral medicine patients). Data were collected from clinical examinations, radiographic imaging, histopathological biopsies, laboratory tests, and patient histories. Diagnostic accuracy, time to diagnosis, and treatment outcomes were evaluated and compared between the two groups.

Results: Oral surgeons demonstrated higher diagnostic accuracy (90%) and faster diagnosis (7.5 days) compared to oral medicine specialists (80% and 10.2 days). Oral surgeons were more likely to use radiographic imaging and histopathological biopsies, while oral medicine specialists utilized serological tests and blood cultures more frequently. Treatment outcomes showed that oral surgeons achieved a higher rate of complete symptom resolution (87%) compared to oral medicine specialists (73%).

Conclusion: Oral surgeons and oral medicine specialists offer complementary diagnostic approaches for soft tissue disorders. Oral surgeons are more efficient in diagnosing conditions that require surgical intervention, while oral medicine specialists excel in diagnosing and managing systemic conditions. Interdisciplinary collaboration between the two specialties is essential for optimal patient care