CytoregR inhibits growth and proliferation of human adenocarcinoma cells via induction of apoptosis


J Kumi-Diaka1, M Hassanhi2, J Brown1, K Merchant1, C Garcia3, W Jimenez3
1 Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Davie FL, 33314, USA
2 School of Medicine, Blood Bank Division, University of Zulia Maracaibo, Venezuela
3 Cytorex BioSciences Inc. 2700 Glades Circle #138, Weston FL. 3331, USA

Date of Submission 02-Dec-2004
Date of Acceptance 09-Jan-2006
Date of Web Publication 09-Jan-2006

Correspondence Address:
J Kumi-Diaka
Department of Biological Sciences, Florida Atlantic University, Davie FL, 33314
USA

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.1186/1477-3163-5-1

 Abstract

Background: Cancer is one of the devastating neovascular diseases that incapacitate so many people the world over. Recent reports from the National Cancer Institute indicate some significant gain therapy and cancer management as seen in the increase in the 5-year survival rate over the past two decades. Although near-perfect cure rate have been reported in the early-stage disease, these data reveal high recurrence rate and serious side effects including second malignancies and fatalities. Most of the currently used anticancer agents are only effective against proliferating cancer cells. Thus attention has been focused on potential anti-cancer agents capable of killing cancer cells independent of the cell cycle state, to ensure effective elimination of most cancer cells. The objective of this study was to test the chemosensitivity and potential mechanism of action of a novel cancer drug, CytoregR, in a panel of human cancer cells.
Methods: the study was performed using a series of bioassays including Trypan blue exclusion, MTS Growth inhibition, LDH-cytotoxicity, TUNEL-Terminal DNA fragmentation Apoptosis Assay, and the Caspase protease CPP32 activity assays.
Results: Cytoreg R induced significant dose- and time-dependent inhibition of growth in all the cells; with significant differences in chemosensitivity (P < 0.05) between the target cells becoming more apparent at 48 hr exposure. CytoregR showed no significant effect on normal cells relative to the tumor cells. Growth inhibition in all the cells was due to induction of apoptosis at lower concentrations of cytoregR (> 1:300). CytoregR-induced caspase protease-3 (CPP32) activation significantly and positively correlated with apoptosis induction and growth inhibition; thus implicating CPP32 as the principal death pathway in cytoregR-induced apoptosis.
Conclusion: CytoregR exerted a dose-and time-dependent growth inhibitory effect in all the target cells through induction of apoptosis via the CPP32 death pathway, independent of hormonal sensitivity of the cells. The present data indicate that not only could CPP32 provide a potential target for regulation of cytoregR-induced apoptosis but also that cytoregR could play a significant role in chemotherapeutic regimen in many human malignant tumors.

 

How to cite this article:
Kumi-Diaka J, Hassanhi M, Brown J, Merchant K, Garcia C, Jimenez W. CytoregR inhibits growth and proliferation of human adenocarcinoma cells via induction of apoptosis. J Carcinog 2006;5:1

How to cite this URL:
Kumi-Diaka J, Hassanhi M, Brown J, Merchant K, Garcia C, Jimenez W. CytoregR inhibits growth and proliferation of human adenocarcinoma cells via induction of apoptosis. J Carcinog [serial online] 2006 [cited 2021 Oct 18];5:1. Available from: https://carcinogenesis.com/text.asp?2006/5/1/1/42159

Introduction

Cancer is one of the devastating neovascular diseases that incapacitate so many people the world over. It is one of the top leading causes of death in the western world. Continuous search for cure and prevention over the past years seems to be yielding encouraging results and this gives the impetus for further search for effective therapeutic regimens against this unyielding human and animal diseases. Significant Progress in the fight against human cancer has been made since the early 1960s. Recent reports from the National Cancer Institute [1] and American Cancer Society [2] indicate some significant gain over the scorch of cancer as seen in the increase in the 5–year survival rate over the past two decades. The overall cancer incidence rates dropped 0.5 percent per year from 1991 to 2001, while death rates from all cancers combined dropped 1.1 percent per year from 1993 to 2001 [1]. Death rates from all cancers combined have been decreasing since the early 1990s. Death rates decreased for 11 of the top 15 cancers in men, and eight of the top 15 cancers in women. Lung cancer deaths rates among women leveled off for the first time between 1995 and 2001, after continuously increasing for many decades [1]. This year’s report indicate that between the periods 1975–1979 and 1995–2000 the five-year cancer survival rate improved for most of the top 15 cancers in both men and women, and the top ten sites in children [1]. However, the incidence rate of Breast cancer in women is among the cancers that are still rising. And in men, although significant gains are made in the survival rates in many cancers including the prostate, the incidence rate in prostate cancer is rising [1]. Furthermore, the incidence of testicular cancer has increased three-folds over the past 40 years especially in the Caucasian young males in the 15 to 35–age range [3-5], in spite of high sensitivity of this cancer to treatment. The risk of developing testicular cancer in a man’s lifetime is approximately 1 in 500 occurring in approximately 1 in 25,000 men per year [2]. Testicular cancer is 4 times more common in Caucasians than in Afro-American men, with intermediate incidence rates among Native Americans, Hispanics and Asians [6,7]. It is the third (14.3% of all male cancers) most commonly diagnosed cancer among males aged 15–19 years [8]. Testicular cancer has shown the highest cure rates of all human cancers. Most cancer patients, especially those diagnosed at the early stage, can now expect to survive the disease [9,10]. Satisfactory survival rate is being achieved in advanced metastatic disease by the use of multidisciplinary therapeutic approach [9,11]. Although near-perfect cure rate with chemotherapy have been reported in early-stage disease [10], these results reveal high recurrence rate, serious side effects [11-13], and disease progression (second malignancies) and treatment-induced fatalities.

Most of the currently used anticancer agents are only effective against proliferating cancer cells [22]. This partially accounts for the high post-treatment recurrence rate of testis cancer. Currently, attention is being focused on potential anti-cancer agents capable of inducing apoptosis cell death independent of the cell cycle state, to ensure effective elimination of all/most cancer cells. One such reagent of interest is the novel drug, cytoregR

Cytoreg® is a novel anticancer drug candidate which uses hydrofluoric and sulfuric acids as active compounds. The product is a pharmacologically active low pH acid mixture (pH < 1.0) of which hydrofluoric acid (HF) and sulfuric acid (H 2 SO 4 ) are active principles. The fluoride ion in cytoreg induces the synthesis of interleukins–1 and 6 (IL–1, IL–6), tumor necrotic factor alpha (TNFα), and stimulating factors of macrophages and granulocytes. IL–1 activates T cells and other cytokines. IL–1 is known to be chemo-protective and radiosensitive, protecting animals against myelosuppression. Cytorex is focused on developingcompounds to treat cancer and immunological-based diseases. Cytorex has world wide intellectual property rights to Cytoreg® and CytoregUNO™ [30].

Cytoreg® has demonstrated anticancer activity in a battery human cancer cells in in vitro studies in our laboratory, and limited preliminary pre-clinical studies elsewhere. Several preliminary in vitro studies in our laboratory indicate that cytoregR inhibits growth and proliferation through induction of apoptosis in a battery of human cancer cells. In this study we hypothesized that the cytoregR will induce growth inhibition of human prostate, breast and testis cancer cells through induction of apoptosis. The goal of this study was to assess degree of potential chemosensitivity of cytoregR to these cancer cells and mechanism of action of the drug in the target cells.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Culture media (RPMI 1640 complete), antibiotics, fetal bovine serum (FBS), trypsin-EDTA, and other culture materials were purchased from Sigma Scientific (St. Louis, MO, USA). The caspase kit (Ac-DEV-AFC/z-VAD-fmk) was from Geno Tech Inc. St. Louis MO.

Test agents

Cytoreg® was supplied by Cytorex Biosciences, Inc.

Cell lines

GI–101, an estrogen-independent metastatic human breast cancer cells, was obtained from Rambaugh-Goodwin Cancer Research institute (RGI) at Plantation FL; MCF–7, estrogen-dependent breast cancer cells, were initially obtained from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) and maintained in our laboratory; PC3, androgen-dependent human prostate adenocarcinoma cells, were originally obtained from the ATCC and maintained in our laboratory. Other human cancer cells originally obtained from ATCC were: LNCaP, androgen-independent adenocarcinoma of the prostate; INTERA–2 cl.D1, androgen-dependent human adenocarcinoma cells of the testis; and Hs 1.Tes, normal human testis cell lines (nPL) Normal primary human placenta cells were a courtesy of Prof Manzur Hassanhi (Medical School at University of Zulia, Maracaibo Venezuela). All cells were cultured and maintained in humidified atmosphere at 37°C and 5% CO 2 in RPMI1640 medium supplemented with 10% bovine fetal serum (FBS), 2 mM glutamine and 100 U/mL of penicillin + 100 mg/mL of streptomycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO. USA).

Culturing and drug treatment of cells

Cells were plated/dispensed into wells of 96–well microtiter plates (MTP) at a concentration of 2 × 10 3 cells/well in 100 μl volumes, and incubated for 48 hrs at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO 2 to allow adherence, prior to exposure to varying concentrations/dilutions of cytoregR (2000, 1000, 500, 200, 100, 50 dilutions; the highest dilution being the lowest exposure concentration, and the lowest dilution being the highest exposure concentration). Briefly, the cells were treated with the predetermined concentrations in triplicates and cultured/grown in humidified atmosphere at 37°C and 5% CO 2 for up to 48 hr. post-treatment. After the 48 hr incubation, the supernatants were collected and frozen for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) determination; the adherent cells were evaluated for post-treatment viability using Trypan blue exclusion and MST assays. Information on cell numbers relative to controls was important in order to determine whether cytoregR was toxic or simply slowing or inhibiting cell replication. The TUNEL assay was used to determine treatment-induced apoptosis in the cells; and Caspase–3 protease involvement in the cytoregR-induced apoptosis was evaluated as described below: The experiment was repeated twice with the same dose ranges to quantify growth inhibitory activity.

MTS growth inhibition assay

MTS is a calorimetric assay based on the ability of viable cells to convert MTS to formazan; the quantity of formazan product, as measured by 490 nm absorbance is directly proportional to the number of viable cells in culture. Briefly, at the end of the 48 hr incubation period with the drugs as described above, 100 μl of the growth medium was removed. The cells were then incubated with 20 μl MTS tetrazolium compound for 3 hr at 37°C. During the incubation the MTS salt is metabolically reduced only by viable cells into an insoluble colored formazan; and the absorbance/optical density (OD) was read and recorded on a Multiscan ELISA MTP reader at a single wavelength of 490 nm. The data were presented as percent post-treatment recovery (%live cells) where the absorbance of from the control, non-treated cells was defined as 100% live cells. The % recovery (%Live cells) were graphed (Y-axis) against the concentrations (X-axis) where IC 50 values could be interpolated from the graph.

LDH-cytotoxicity assay

Lactate dehydrogenase activity was measured by a non-radioactive protocol using the LDH cytotox kit (Cat. #. 1644 793: Boehringer-Mannheim GmbG, Bochemica). Test principle : The LDH assay is based on the release of the cytosol enzyme, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) from cells with damaged cellular membranes. Thus in cell culture, the course of drug-induced cytotoxicity can be followed quantitatively by measuring the activity of LDH in the supernatant. Methodology: The previously frozen supernatants were thawed for LDH determination. Briefly, 100 μL/well of each cell-free supernatant was transferred in triplicates into wells in a 96–well microtiter plates (MTP) and 100 μL of LDH-assay reaction mixture (Kit: dye-catalyst mixture) added to each well. After 3 hr incubation under standard conditions of 37°C 5% CO 2 , the absorbance/optical density of the color generated was read on Multiskan biochromatic automatic microplate reader at 490 nm. Percentage treatment-induced cytotoxicity was computed as follows:


Where, OD t = mean optical density of treated cells; OD c = mean optical density of controls without treatment.

The ODs were graphed (Y-axis) against the concentrations (X-axis) and the IC 50 values interpolated from the graph

TUNEL-Terminal DNA fragmentation apoptosis assay

The presence of apoptosis was determined by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL), using the ApopTag R kit (Boehringer Mannheim Co, Indianapolis, IN) as previously described (14). The kit reagents detect apoptotic cells in situ by specific end labeling and detection of DNA fragments produced by the apoptotic process. Briefly, cells were suspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and aliquots were first pre-stained with supra-vital propidium iodide (PI) stain, and examined under fluorescence microscope to differentiate between apoptosis (PI negative) and necrosis (PI positive), according to previously described procedure [15]. To perform the TUNEL assay, slides were prepared with aliquots from the PBS-cell suspensions. The cells (slides) were then permeabilized with Triton X–100 at 4°C for 2 min; then flooded with TdT enzyme and digoxigenin-dUTP reaction buffer (TUNEL) reagent for 60 min at 37°C; followed by further incubation in anti-fluorescein antibody Fab (conjugated with alkaline phosphatase). After this the cells were stained with chromogenic substrate (Fast Red) and mounted. Negative controls were performed by substituting distilled water for TdT enzyme in the preparation of working solutions. The stained mounted cells were examined at 100×, 200× and 400× magnification of the microscope (Olympus BH–2). Cell death was quantified by counting 150 cells in 5–10 separate fields of view per slide, and noting the percentage of apoptotic cells based on morphological appearance, as previously described [16,17]. Percentage treatment-induced apoptosis was computed as follows:

Caspase protease CPP32 activity

The activity of caspase protease–3 (CPP32) was determined by using a fluorescent substrate for caspase-like proteases (Apo-Assay kit containing CPP32 specific peptide, Ac-DEV-AFC, and CPP32 inhibitor, zVAD-fmk, + lysing buffer: Geno Tech Inc. St. Louis MO). The cells were preincubated with and without caspase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk, prior to treatment with genistein isoflavone. Cells were then assayed for caspase protease activity. Briefly, 1 × 10 3 cells/ml were seeded in triplicates in 96–well microtitre plates, cultured for 48 hr as previously described. Caspase inhibitor, z-VAD-fmk (10 μM) was directly dispensed into each well and incubated for 2 hr. The supernatants were carefully aspirated and discarded; and the cells treated with varying concentrations of genistein (G 1–70 ) for up to 48 hr; harvested and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, then resuspended in PBS. One half of each cell suspension was processed for apoptosis determination. The other half was centrifuged again and the pelleted cells resuspended in hypotonic lysing buffer on ice. After 30 min on ice cells were disrupted by passing 20 times through 27 G needle and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm × 10 min. The supernatants (25 – 50μg total protein) were incubated with caspase reagents for 2 hr at 37°C, and substrate cleavage determined by recording the absorbance at 405 nm on ELISA plate reader as previously described [18,19] and caspase–3 (CPP32) activity was expressed/calculated as a percentage of the positive control. In principle, the level of caspase activity in the cell lysate is directly proportional to the color reaction; hence to the degree of apoptosis.

Statistical analysis

The experiments were performed in triplicates and repeated twice, to confirm similar results. Significance of the differences in mean values was determined using the Student’s t-test and considering P < 0.05 to be statistically significant [31]

Results

Cell growth inhibition

Cytoreg® was examined for its ability to inhibit growth and proliferation in a panel of human cancer cells [breast cancer cells – GI–101, MCF–7; prostate cancer cells – PC3, LNCaP; testis cancer cells – INTERA–2 cl.D1; normal human placenta – nPL; normal human primary testis cell line – Hs 1.Tes]. Cytoreg R was added to the adherent cells directly at dilutions of 50, 100, 200, 500, 1000, and 2000 as described in the materials. The data obtained revealed that Cytoreg R induced significant dose- and time-dependent inhibition of growth and proliferation in all the cells with significant differences in chemosensitivity (P < 0.05 – P < 0.01) in the different cancer cells as summarized in [Figure 1][Figure 2][Figure 3] and [Table 1]. Difference in chemosensitivity to cytoregR increased with exposure time, more apparent at 48 hr incubation. The Trypan blue exclusion stain indicated that cell viability significantly decreased in all cell types with increasing exposure concentration of the Cytoreg R but no significant effect on the normal cells relative to the tumor cells at the physiological pH7.1 (the 1:500 dilution) of Cytoreg R [Figure 1],[Figure 2],[Figure 3],[Figure 4]. Significant negative correlations were found between LDH and MST & Trypan blue activities (r = -.75, P < 0.01), and significant positive correlations between MTS and Trypan blue exclusion assays (r = 63, P < 0.01). These results indicate the validity/accuracy of the data obtained. Significant treatment-induced morphological changes indicative of cell death and growth inhibition were observed in all the cells with increasing concentration of cytoregR.

Treatment-induced apoptosis

The TUNEL DNA fragmentation analysis was used to determine mode of cell death in growth inhibition in the treated cells as described in the methods. [Figure 4],[Figure 5] and [Table 1] revealed that CytoregR induced apoptosis as the main mode of growth inhibition in the panel of cells studied; in a dose-dependent manner, and with significant differences in chemosensitivity (P < 0.01) between the cells. The normal, non-cancer cells, nPL and Hs 1.Tes testis cells, were not significantly affected (P < 0.05) by CytoregR at the physiological pH7.1 (1:500 dilution). However, with increasing exposure concentrations (lower dilutions, 200 – 50) cell death due to necrosis significantly increased concurrent with decreasing apoptotic cell death [Figure 4],[Figure 5][Table 1]. The classical characteristics of apoptosis – cell shrinkage, nuclear condensation, formation of apoptotic bodies-were observed in all cells ([Figure 7]>-microphotos), to varying degrees; indicating that growth inhibition was predominantly due to treatment-induced apoptosis.

To determine the relationship between growth inhibition and apoptosis induction, we correlated the percentage of viable cells with the percentage of induced apoptosis. [Figure 5] revealed that decreasing viability (increasing growth inhibition) concurrently paralleled increasing rate of apoptosis induction in the cells. The overall data revealed a significant negative correlation between MTS/Trypan blue exclusion and apoptosis induction (r = -0.67, P < 0.01).

To determine the potential involvement in the caspase protease 3 in the molecular mechanism of Cytoreg R -induced apoptosis, the cells were treated with Cytoreg R co-administered with or without CPP32 inhibitor (DEVD-fmk), and then cultured as previously described. Post-treatment apoptosis was determined as previously described. CytoregR induces expression of CPP32 in all the cells with subsequent induction of apoptosis; consistent with previous observations in genistein-treated cells (Kumi-Diaka et al, NA Sanderson and Alexis Hall, 2000). As shown in [Figure 6], treatment-induced expression of caspase–3 protease (CPP32) significantly correlated with treatment-induced apoptosis in all the cells, with manifestation of dose dependency on Cytoreg R . It was observed that blocking of CPP32 with the caspase–3 inhibitor, DEVD-fmk, significantly (P < 0.001) reduced apoptosis induction in the cancerous cells; indicating the significant role of CPP32 in the molecular pathway of Cytoreg R -induced apoptosis in the panel of cells studied, consistent with observations in other previous studies. Blocking the expression of CPP32 did not completely stop treatment-induced apoptosis in any cell; suggesting the existence of an alternative or potential, caspase-independent death pathway in Cytoreg R -induced apoptosis in all the cells. Caspase protease–3 activation/expression significantly correlated with apoptosis induction (0.78, P < 0.01).

Discussions

The battery of assays that were used in the present studies indicates that cytoregR inhibits cell growth and proliferation in the panel of human cancer cells through induction of apoptosis at the physiological concentration/dilution of the drug. Growth inhibition of the tested cells strongly correlated with the MTT, Trypan blue exclusion, and LDH assay results. The pattern of response in all the targeted cells was significantly similar, and consistent with results of previous studies with genistein isoflavone [182021]. The treatment-induced morphological changes observed in all the cells (indicative of cell death, and growth inhibition) were consistent with previous observations in other studies with other cytotoxic agents [18,22]. The inverse correlation between the MTT and the LDH assays offers a strong support for the reliability of the data. The overall data demonstrate that Cytoreg R significantly inhibit cell growth and proliferation through induction of apoptosis as the main death pathway in all the cells; consistent with previous results in with other agents [23,24]. In all the cells, induction of apoptosis correlated inversely with decrease cell viability, concurrent with increasing concentration of cytoreg R ; further indicating that apoptosis was mostly accountable for cell death and growth inhibition. The observed bio-morphological changes indicative of apoptosis were identical in pattern and severity in the cells; consistent with previous results [25,26]. However, cytoregR had no significant effect on normal, non-cancerous human cells relative to the cancer cells studied. The bio-morphological hallmarks of apoptosis observed in the treated cells were in conformity with previous observations in apoptosis in other mammalian cancer cells [26,27]. Similar to observations in preliminary studies, the chemotoxic effects of cytoreg R in the cells at dilutions within physiologic (pH 7–7.2) concentrations (dilutions of 2000, 1000, 500, 200) were selective for the cancer cells studied; thus indicating that the differential effects of cytoreg R on the human tumor versus normal cells is mostly due to the chemical composition of the compound and not the acidity of the compound.

The potential signaling pathways in cytoregR-induced apoptosis is under investigation presently. However, in the present results the significant positive correlation of CPP32 expression with percent apoptosis induction in all the cells strongly implicates caspase–3 in the apoptosis inducing mechanism in the cells. The observation is consistent with the significant role of caspase–3 protease in genistein-induced apoptosis in both human testis and prostate cancer cells [1819212829].

CytoregR induced apoptosis in both hormone-sensitive (GI–101, LNCaP) and hormone-independent cancer cells (PC3) to varying degrees; with significant differences in sensitivity. Therefore cytoregR could be used in treatment of cancer cells independently of hormonal sensitivity of the cells. As observed in this study, since both hormone-sensitive and hormone independent tumors were susceptive to growth inhibition by cytoregR, it could be inferred that the action of cytoregR does not appear related to hormone modulation/ regulation activities, at least not directly.

Conclusion

It is concluded from the data obtained that: i) Cytoreg R exerts a dose- and time-dependent growth inhibition effects in the panel of the cancer cells investigated, and with significant differences (P > 0.05)in chemosensitivity between the cells; ii) growth inhibition in cells was mostly through the apoptosis death pathway; iii) CytoregR did not significantly inhibit growth in the normal placenta and testis cells studied; iv) Cytoreg R induces activation/expression of CPP32 concurrent with apoptosis induction in all the cells; thus implicating utilization of CPP32 in the apoptosis-induction death machinery; consistent with previous data; and v) caspase–3 protease could provide potential target for regulation of Cytoreg R -induced apoptosis in the panel of cells investigated independent of hormonal sensitivity of the cells. Our data show that Cytoreg R is a strong inhibitor of proliferation and growth of a series of human cancer cells, and thus supports the view that this novel drug could play a significant role in chemotherapeutic regimen for at least some human malignant tumors. Preliminary in vivo animal studies and limited human studies showed no significant side effects.

Competing interests

We the authors, declare that we have no competing interests of the sort with respect to this research.

Authors’ contributions

JK-D contributed to the conception, and design of the experiment; contributed to the culture, the bioassays, analysis of the data and initial writing/drafting of the manuscript. HM contributed to the culturing and bioassays, to the collection of data and helped in the final writing of the manuscript. CG and WH participated in the design of the study, collection and statistical analysis of the data. JB and KM helped in the culturing and bioassays (independently) and prove-read the final manuscript for submission.

Acknowledgements

Florida Atlantic university is acknowledged for funding this project. Cytorex BioSciences Inc. is acknowledged for providing some of the bioassay materials and the cytoregR drug for this project. The authors also acknowledge Dr Matucci, the inventor of cytoregR for the release of the drug for this project.

References

1. Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LAG, Wu X, Jamison PM, Wingo P, Howe HL, Anderson RN, Edwards BK: Annual Report to the Nation on the Status of Cancer, 1975-2001, with a Special Feature Regarding Survival. Cancer 2004.http://www.cdc.gov/cancer, http://www.cancer.gov/newscenter/pressreleases/ReportNation2004Release, http://interscience.wiley.com/cancer/report2004   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2. American Cancer Society: Report to the nation on the status of cancer. Retrieved from. http://www.cancer.org/eprise/main/docroot/STT/stt 0,2003   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3. Shottenfeld D, Warshauer M, Sherlock S, Zauher A, Leder M, Payne R: The epidermiology of testicular cancer in young adults. Am J Epidemiol 1980, 112: 232-246.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4. Tulinius H, Day N, Muir C: Rarity of testis cancer in Negros. Lancet 1973, 1: 35-36.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5. Brown GG: Testicular cancer: an overview. Med Surg Nursing 2003, 12: 37-48.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6. Bosl GJ, Bajorin DE, Ssheinfeld J, Motzer RJ, Shaganti RSK: Cancer of the testis. In Cancer: Principles & practices of oncology . Edited by: Devita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA. Philadelphia: Lippincott; 2001:1491-1518.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7. Henderson BE, Benton B, Jing J, Yu MC, Pike MC: Risk factors for cancer of the testis in young men. International Journal of Cancer 1979, 23 (5) : 598-602.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8. Xiao-Cheng Wu, Chen VW, Steele B, Roffers PA, Klotz JB, Correa CN, Carozza SE: Cancer incidence in adolescents and young adults in the United States (1992-19997). Journal of Adolescent Health 2003, 32 (6) : 405-420.   Back to cited text no. 8
    
9. Kim ND, Mehta R, Yu W, Neeman I, Livney T, Amichay A, Poirier D, Nicholls P, Kirby A, Jiang W, Mansel R, Ramachandran C, Rabi T, Kaplan B, Lansky E: Chemopreventive and adjuvant therapeutic potential of pomegranate (Punica granatum) for human breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002, 71: 203-217.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10. Tang DG, Porter AT: A hopeful weapon for Prostate cancer. The Prostate 1997, 32: 284-23.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11. Gullatte MM, (Ed): A chemotherapy handbook: Clinical guide to anti-neoplastic therapy . Pittsburg, PA: Oncology Nursing Society Press; 2001.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12. Dearnaley D, Huddart R, Horwich A: Regular review: Managing testicular cancer. British Medical Journal 2001, 322 (7302) : 1583-1588.   Back to cited text no. 12
    
13. Lampe H, Horwich A, Norman A, Nichols J, Dearnaley DP: Fertility after chemotherapy for testicular germ cell cancers. Journal of ClinicalOncology 1997, 15 (1) : 239-245.   Back to cited text no. 13
    
14. Kumi-Diaka J, Rodriquez R, Gaudazi G: Influence of genistein (4′,5′,7-trihydroxyisoflavone) on the growth and proliferation of selected testicular cells. Biology of the Cell 1998, 90: 349-354.   Back to cited text no. 14
    
15. Sinha Hikim AP, Rajavashisth TB, Sinha Hikim I, Lue Y, Bonavera JJ, Leung A, Wang C, Swerdloff RS: Significance of apoptosis in the temporal and stage-specific loss of germ cells in the adult rat after gonadotropin deprivation. Biol Reprod 1997, 57 (5) : 1193-201.   Back to cited text no. 15
    
16. Cotter TG, Martin SJ: Techniques in apoptosis; A User’s guide. Portland Press Ltd, London; 1994:10-12.   Back to cited text no. 16
    
17. Kumi-Diaka J, Nguyen V, Butler A: Cytotoxic potential of the phytochemical genistein isoflavone (4′,5′,7-trihydroxyisoflavone) and certain environmental chemical compounds on testicular cells. Biology of the Cell 1999, 91: 515-523.   Back to cited text no. 17
    
18. Kumi-Diaka J, Butler A: Caspase-protease activation during the process of genistein-induced apoptosis in TM4 testicular cells. Biology of the Cell 2000, 92: 115-124.   Back to cited text no. 18
    
19. Borutaite V, Budriunaite A, Morkuniene R, Brown GC: Release of mitochondrial cytochrome c and activation of cytosolic caspases induced by myocardial ischaemia. Biochem Biophys Acta 2001, 1537 (2) : 101-9.   Back to cited text no. 19
    
20. Matsukawa Y, Marui N, Skai T, Satomi Y, Yoshida M, Matsumoto K, Nishino H, Aoike A: Genistein arrests cell cycle progression at G2-M. Cancer Res 1993, 53: 1328-1331.   Back to cited text no. 20
    
21. Kumi-Diaka J, Sanderson AA, Hall A: The mediating role of caspase-3protease in the intracellular mechanism of genistein-induced apoptosis in human prostate carcinoma cell lines, DU145 and LNCaP. Biology of the Cell 2000, 92: 595-604.   Back to cited text no. 21
    
22. Wyllie AH, Kerr JFK, Currie AR: Cell death: The significance of apoptosis. International Review of Cytology 1980, 68: 251-305.   Back to cited text no. 22
    
23. Sen D’IncalciS: Apoptosis: Biochemical events and relevance to cancer chemotherapy. FEBS Letters 1992, 307: 122-127.   Back to cited text no. 23
    
24. Duke RC, Cohen JJ: Morphological and biochemical assays of apoptosis. In Current protocols in immunology . Edited by: Coligan JE, Kruisbeak AM. New York, John Wiley & Sons; 1992. 3.17.1.   Back to cited text no. 24
    
25. Kerr JF, Winterford CM, Harmon BV: Apoptosis: Its significance in cancer and cancer therapy. Cancer 1994, 73: 2013-2226.   Back to cited text no. 25
    
26. Kumi-Diaka J: Chemosensitivity of human prostate cancer cells, PC3 and LNCaP to genistein isoflavone and β-lapachone. Biology of the Cell 2002, 94: 37-44.   Back to cited text no. 26
    
27. Knowles LM, Zigrossi DA, Taubert RA, Hightower C, Milner JA: Flavonoids suppress androgen-independent human prostate tumor proliferation. Nutr Cancer 2000, 38: 116-122.   Back to cited text no. 27
    
28. Janicke RU, Hg P, Sprengart ML, Porter AG: Caspase-3 is required for alpha-fodrin cleavage but dispensable for cleavage of other substrates in apoptosis. J Biol Chem 1998, 273: 15540-15545.   Back to cited text no. 28
    
29. Frahm S, Kurtz A, Kluwe L, Farassati F, Friedrich RE, Mautner VF: Sulindac derivatives inhibit cell growth and induce apoptosis in primary cells from malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors of NF1-patients. Cancer Cell International 2004, 4: 1-16.   Back to cited text no. 29
    
30. Website title http://www.cytorex.com   Back to cited text no. 30
    
31. Website title http://www.faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/t_ind_stats.htl   Back to cited text no. 31
    

Figures

[Figure 1][Figure 2][Figure 3][Figure 4][Figure 5][Figure 6][Figure 7]
 
 

Tables

[Table 1]