The mRNA expression of IGF-1 and IGF-1R in human breast cancer: Association with clinico-pathological parameters

Posted by UncategorizedPosted on


W Al Sarakbi, YM Chong, SLJ Williams, AK Sharma, K Mokbel
Breast Unit St.George’s Hospital and Medical School Tooting, London SW17 0QT, United Kingdom

Date of Submission 16-Jan-2006
Date of Acceptance 25-May-2006
Date of Web Publication 25-May-2006

Correspondence Address:
K Mokbel
Breast Unit St.George’s Hospital and Medical School Tooting, London SW17 0QT
United Kingdom

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

DOI: 10.1186/1477-3163-5-16

How to cite this article:
Al Sarakbi W, Chong Y M, Williams S, Sharma A K, Mokbel K. The mRNA expression of IGF-1 and IGF-1R in human breast cancer: Association with clinico-pathological parameters. J Carcinog 2006;5:16

How to cite this URL:
Al Sarakbi W, Chong Y M, Williams S, Sharma A K, Mokbel K. The mRNA expression of IGF-1 and IGF-1R in human breast cancer: Association with clinico-pathological parameters. J Carcinog [serial online] 2006 [cited 2021 Oct 26];5:16. Available from: https://carcinogenesis.com/text.asp?2006/5/1/16/42174

Background

The insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor is a member of a large family of transmembrane signal transducing molecules. The IGF system is composed of IGF ligands, receptors, and binding proteins. These system components form a highly regulated network of interactions both among themselves and between other biologic signalling pathways [1,2].

There are two characterised ligands, IGF-I and IGF-II whose activities are mainly mediated by type I and II receptors [1,3]. IGF–1R is necessary for the normal progression through the cell cycle and for normal growth and development [4,5].

The principal pathways for transduction of the IGF signal are mitogen-activated protein kinase and phosphatidylinositol 3′-kinase [6,7]. After ligand-dependent receptor autophosphorylation, the IGF-IR phosphorylates a series of adaptor proteins, including insulin receptor substrate–1, to activate intracellular signalling cascades [7]. The protein kinase pathway is responsible for the mitogenic signal observed after IGF stimulation but may also be accountable for cell survival in cells over expressing the IGF–1R [8]. The IGF system has been implicated in promoting mitogenic, metastatic, and antiapoptotic phenotypes in breast cancer. As a consequence of the ability of IGF to promote tumorigenesis, pharmacologic interventions targeting the IGF system are being devised [9-11]. It is believed that IGF–1 can affect breast cells through endocrine, autocrine, and paracrine mechanisms [12-14].

We have recently reported using RT-PCR that IGF–1 is lower in breast cancer tissue than in adjacent non-cancerous breast tissue (ANCT) thus supporting the paracrine hypothesis [15]. The same study demonstrated no significant difference in the expression of IGF–1R between breast cancer and ANCT, neither was there any significant correlation between PCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC) expressions of IGF–1R [15].

This aim of our study is to evaluate the relationship between mRNA expression levels of IGF–1 and various clinicopathological parameters.

Methods

Specimens

A total of 31 patients ( n = 31) with diagnosis of operable breast cancer were randomly selected. Local protocols were followed regarding ethical approval and patients’ consent. A specimen of tumour and another specimen of ANCT were obtained from each patient. They were frozen in liquid nitrogen within 30 minutes of excision and stored at –70°C until use.

RNA extraction

Total cellular RNA was extracted from cancerous tissue and ANCT using Total RNA Isolation Reagent (Advanced Biotechnologies) according to manufacturer’s protocol. Approximately 10 mg of cancerous tissue was homogenized. A larger amount of ANCT (20 – 50 mg) was used as high fat content made it difficult to obtain a sufficient RNA concentration for analysis. Quantification of RNA following treatment with DNase was carried out in triplicate using Ribogreen reagent (Molecular Probes Europe BV, Leiden, Netherlands) according to manufacturer’s protocol.

RT-PCR

Taqman RT-PCR was carried out on each sample using the SYBR Green PCR Mastermix (Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) and the ABI PRISM 7700 Sequence Detector (Perkin Elmer Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The RNA extraction and the preparation of the RT-PCR mix were carried out in different rooms. Preparation of the RT-PCR mix was carried out in an extraction hood.

The sequences for the forward and reverse oligonucleotide primers and probes were designed using Primer Express Software (PE-Applied Biosystems, Warrington, UK) and were intron spanned to prevent amplification of genomic DNA. The oligonucleotide sequences of these primers and probes are given in [Table 1].

The conditions for the reverse transcription were 50°C for 2 min, 60°C for 10 min and 92°C for 5 min. The polymerase chain reaction step was carried out for 50 cycles for 20 sec at 92°C and 25 sec at 62°C. For negative controls, RNase-free water was used in the RT-PCR instead of RNA. For positive controls, 18S ribosomal mRNA was used. The relative levels of IGF–1 and IGF–1 R mRNA expression were calculated by comparing their readings (arbitrary units) to the readings of a housekeeping gene (18S ribosomal mRNA). The association between the relative levels of IGF–1 and IGF-1R mRNA and clinicopathological parameters was examined using statistical analysis of variance. The clinicopathological parameters included patients’ age, tumour size, grade vascular invasion, estrogen receptor (ER) status, lymph node status, and associated DCIS.

Results

All 31 patients had their operations performed in the period between January 1997 to December 1998 and underwent either a mastectomy or a wide local excision together with lymph node clearance or sampling. The median age was 69 and 7 patients were below the age of 50. Six patients were pre-menopausal. All samples contained invasive ductal carcinoma and 14 of these also contained ductal carcinoma in-situ (DCIS). 18 cases were positive for estrogen receptor (ER) immunostaining. Histological grading of cancerous tissue revealed 3 cases of grade 1, 10 cases of grade 2 and 17 cases of grade 3. The histology grade of one case could not be determined.

All 31 specimens had detectable levels of mRNA for both IGF–1 and IGF–1R. The median values of relative expression of IGF–1 mRNA were 0.469 (0.281-0.711) 0.762 (0.338–0.874) in tumour and ANCT respectively (p = 0.0002).

The IGF-1 receptor values were 0.118 (0.0763–0.1685) in tumour specimens and 0.0944 (0.0356–0.1242) in ANCT. The difference was not statistically significant indicating a more universal expression.

We observed a significant association between IGF–1 mRNA expression and lymph node status (0, 1–3, >3 positive lymph nodes, p = 0.0032).

There was no significant association between IGF-I mRNA expression and patients’ age (p = 0.3683), tumour size (p = 0.855), grade (p = 0.8789), vascular invasion (p = 0.5717), ER status (p = 0.5498) or the presence of DCIS (p = 0.8456).

There was no significant association between IGF–1R mRNA expression and patients’ age (p = 0.115), tumour size (p = 0.7417), grade (p = 0.1084), vascular invasion (p = 0.5879), ER status (p = 0.544), the presence of DCIS (p = 0.2966), lymph node status (p = 0.9412) or tumour stage (p = 0.0608-0.943). [Table 2] shows the various p-values.

We observed an interesting significant association between IGF–1R and the type of surgical procedure performed (wide local excision/mastectomy) (p = 0.0288). [Table 3] shows the raw data.

Discussion

Previous data shows that the interaction of insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) with the IGF-I receptor promotes cell proliferation, stimulates mitosis, combats apoptosis, and induces the transformation of normal cells to cancer cells [5,16-19].

IGFs seem to be freely available to the malignant epithelial cells from both endocrine and paracrine sources. However, the relative importance of endocrine production in normal breast tissues remains to be defined.

Earlier studies looked into the association between IGF–1/IGF–1R expression and clinicopathological features of breast cancer with conflicting results. Pappa V et al found no correlation between IGF1–R content and a variety of tumor parameters (tumor size, lymph node involvement, grade) and host characteristics (age, body mass index, menopausal status) [20]. Other studies, although looked at IGF–1 mRNA expression, failed to examine its relation to other clinical parameters [12, 21, 22].

The level of IGF-I mRNA expression seems to correlate with the nodal status, the best single prognostic indicator in human breast cancer. There is an increasing body of evidence that estrogen induces the expression of several members of IGF family including IGF-I, IGF–1R, IGF-II and IGF–2R [23-26]. The lack of correlation between ER status and both IGF-I and IGF-1R could be explained on the basis of the multiplicity of molecular markers influenced by estrogen.

The lack of correlation between both IGF-I and IGF–1R and patients’ age, tumour size, grade, vascular invasion or the presence of DCIS are in consistence with the findings of Sancak et al [27] who found no association between the serum level of IGF-I and these clinicopathological parameters. It is important to note that protein expression does not always correlate with gene expression. The significance of the association between IGF–1R and the type of procedure performed is yet to be explained.

Our results should be interpreted with caution due to the small sample size.

The significant correlation we observed between nodal status and mRNA expression levels underscores the need for further studies with long-term clinical outcome data to validate the potential role of IGF–1 expression as a prognostic marker.

References

1. Zhang X, Yee D: Tyrosine kinase signalling in breast cancer: insulin-like growth factors and their receptors in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2000, 2 (3) : 170-175.   Back to cited text no. 1
    
2. Mitropoulou TN, Theocharis AD, Nikitovic D, Karamanos NK, Tzanakakis GN: IGF-I affects glycosaminoglycan/proteoglycan synthesis in breast cancer cells through tyrosine kinase-dependent and -independent pathways. Biochimie 2004, 86 (4-5) : 251-259.   Back to cited text no. 2
    
3. Daughaday WH, Rotwein P: Insulin-like growth factors I and II. Peptide, messenger ribonucleic acid and gene structures, serum and tissue concentrations. Endocr Rev 1989, 10: 68-91.   Back to cited text no. 3
    
4. Baker J, Liu JP, Roberston EJ, Efstratiadis A: Role of insulin-like growth factors in embryonic and postnatal growth. Cell 1993, 75: 37-82.   Back to cited text no. 4
    
5. Sell C, Dumenil G, Deveand C, Miura M, Coppola D, DeAngelis T, Rubin R, Efstratiadis A, Baserga R: Effect of null mutation of the insulin-like growth factor I receptor gene on growth and transformation of mouse embryofibroblasts. Mol Cell Biol 1994, 14: 3604-3612.   Back to cited text no. 5
    
6. Adams TE, Epa VC, Garrett TP, Ward CW: Structure and function of the type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor. Cell Mol Life Sci 2000, 57: 1050-1093.   Back to cited text no. 6
    
7. Burtrum D, Zhu Z, Lu D, Anderson DM, Prewett M, Pereira DS, Bassi R, Abdullah R, Hooper AT, Koo H, Jimenez X, Johnson D, Apblett R, Kussie P, Bohlen P, Witte L, Hicklin DJ, Ludwig DL: A fully human monoclonal antibody to insulin-like growth factor I receptor blocks ligand-dependent signalling and inhibits human tumour growth in vivo . Cancer Res 2003, 63: 8912-8921.   Back to cited text no. 7
    
8. Heron-Milhavet L, Karas M, Goldsmith CM, Baum BJ, LeRoith D: Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) receptor activation rescues UV-damaged cells through a p38 signaling pathway. Potential role of the IGF-I receptor in DNA repair. J Biol Chem 2001, 276: 18185-18192.   Back to cited text no. 8
    
9. Besegra R: The insulin-like growth factor I receptor: a key to tumor growth? Cancer Res 1995, 55: 249-259.   Back to cited text no. 9
    
10. Surmacz E, Bartucci M: Role of estrogen receptor alpha in modulating IGF-I receptor signalling and function in breast cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2004, 23: 385-394.   Back to cited text no. 10
    
11. Ibrahim YH, Yee D: Insulin-like growth factor-I and cancer risk. Growth Horm IGF Res 2004, 14: 261-269.   Back to cited text no. 11
    
12. Yee D, Paik S, Lebovic GS, Marcus RR, Favoni RE, Cullen KJ, Lippman ME, Rosen N: Analysis of insulin-like growth factor I gene expression in malignancy: evidence for a paracrine role in human breast cancer. Mol endocrinol 1989, 3: 509-517.   Back to cited text no. 12
    
13. Giani C, Cullen KJ, Campani D, Rasmussen A: IGF-II mRNA and protein are expressed in the stroma and invasive breast cancers: an in situ hybridization and immunohistochemistry study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1996, 41: 43-50.   Back to cited text no. 13
    
14. Paik S: Expression of IGF-I and IGF-II in breast tissue. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1992, 22: 31-38.   Back to cited text no. 14
    
15. Chong YM, Williams SLJ, Elkak A, Sharma AK, Mokbel K: Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 (IGF-1) and its receptor mRNA levels in Breast Cancer and Adjacent Non-neoplastic Tissue. Anticancer Research 2006, in press.   Back to cited text no. 15
    
16. Coppola D, Ferber A, Miura M, Sell C, D’Ambrosio C, Rubin R, Baserga R: A functional IGF-1 receptor is required for the mitogenic and transforming activities of the epidermal growth factor receptor. Mol Cell Biol 1994, 14: 4588-4595.   Back to cited text no. 16
    
17. Rodriguez-Tarduchy G, Collins M, Garcia I, Lopez-Rivas A: Insulin like growth factor inhibits apoptosis in IL-3 depenmdant homeopoietic cells. J Immunol 1992, 149: 535.   Back to cited text no. 17
    
18. Resnicoff M, Abraham D, Yutanawibboonchai W, Rotman HL, Kajstura J, Rubin R, Zoltick P, Baserga R: The insulin like growth factor 1receptor protects tumour cells from apoptosis. Canc Res 1995, 55: 3003.   Back to cited text no. 18
    
19. Long L, Rubin R, Baserga R, Brodt P: Loss of metastatic phenotype in murine carcinoma cells expressing an antisense RNA to insulin-growth factor receptor. Can Res 1995, 55: 1006.   Back to cited text no. 19
    
20. Papa V, Gliozzo B, Clark GM, McGuire WL, Moore D, Fujita-Yamaguchi Y, Vigneri R, Goldfine ID, Pezzino V: Insulin-like growth factor-I receptors are overexpressed and predict a low risk in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 1993, 53: 3736-3740.   Back to cited text no. 20
    
21. Voskuil DW, Bosma A, Vrieling A, Rookus MA, van ‘t Veer LJ: Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-system mRNA quantities in normal and tumor breast tissue of women with sporadic and familial breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004, 84 (3) : 225-233.   Back to cited text no. 21
    
22. Gebauer G, Jager W, Lang N: mRNA expression of components of the inculin-like growth factor system in breast cancer cell lines, tissues and metastatic breast cacner cells. Anticancer Res 1998, 18: 1191-1195.   Back to cited text no. 22
    
23. Lee AV, Jackson JG, Gooch Jl, Hilsenbeck SG, Coronado-Heinsohn E, Osborne CK, Yee D: Enhancement of insulin-like growth factor signalling in human breast cancer: estrogen regulation of insulin receptor substrate-1 expression in vitro and in vivo. Mol Endocrinol 1999, 13: 787-796.   Back to cited text no. 23
    
24. Stewart AJ, Westley BR, May FE: Modulation of the proliferative response of breast cancer cells to growth factors by oestrogen. Br J Cancer 1992, 66: 640-648.   Back to cited text no. 24
    
25. Yee D, Cullen KJ, Paik S, Perdue JF, Hampton B, Schwartz A, Lippman ME, Rosen N: Insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression in human breast cancer. Cancer Res 1988, 48: 6691-6696.   Back to cited text no. 25
    
26. Lee AV, Darbre P, King RJ: Processing of insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II) by human breast cancer cells. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1994, 99: 211-220.   Back to cited text no. 26
    
27. Sancak B, Goskun U, Gunel N, Onuk E, Cihan A, Karamercan A, Yildirim Y, Ozkan S: No association between serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I, vascular endothelial growth factor, prolactin and clinicopathological characteristics of breast carcinoma after surgery. Intern Med J 2004, 34: 310-315.   Back to cited text no. 27
    

 

Tables

[Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]